|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Teaching SMART on Teachers and Students
|
University of South Florida
The Center for Research, Evaluation, Assessment and Measurement
Funded by The National Science Foundation
September 2006
|
 |
Summary of Teaching SMART Year 1 and Year 2 at Pizzo Elementary:
- On an average, teachers' positive attitude towards science increased as the school year progressed. This
applied for both Year 1 and Year 2, although in Year 1, mean differences were slightly higher than those of Year 2.
- On an average, students' attitude towards science increased marginally throughout the school years. This
pattern applied for Year 1 and Year 2.
- By grade, students in 3rd and 4th grade showed more positive attitudes towards science as compared to 5th
grade students.
- At the end of Year 2, a notable increase was observed in the percentage of students who indicated that they
would like to work in science-related jobs when they grow up. This applied to all students of all grades.
- By gender, a significantly larger percentage of female students showed interest in future "definitely
science-related" careers. This trend was observed in both Year 1 and Year 2.
- In Year 2 particularly, while the percentage of male students who would like to do science-related jobs was
similar across time (approx. 16%), the percentage of female students who would like to do science-related jobs
increased approx. 29% to 45%.
- As the school year progressed, in both Year 1 and Year 2, teachers reported more frequent science activities
and assessment in areas of science problem solving, student use of science tools, and students' science
presentation in class.
- Less frequent practice was observed in student practice writing about science or making tables, graphs,
and charts.
- Students indicated more frequent science activities in groups, class presentations, and science videos or
movies. This showed consistency with teachers' data.
- Similarly, students indicated less practice in writing science reports, making tables, graph and charts,
and working independently on science activities.
|
Dr. John Usera, Patricia Shulte, and Kristine Ellerbruch
Institute for Educational Leadership & Evaluation
Funded by The National Institutes of Health (SEPA)
Evaluation Report - 2006
|
|
Findings — Students
- Students of Teaching SMART teachers demonstrated a statistically significant change in knowledge about
specific science topics as compared to students of teachers who were not involved in Teaching SMART.
- For the nine natural science lessons in which the students participated, the average score was improved
by 21.5% (
= +1.34; maximum score = 9).
- Students of Teaching SMART teachers who completed the third grade science lessons showed a 17.9% improvement
in their test scores (
= +1.15; maximum score = 9).
- Students of Teaching SMART teachers who completed the fourth grade science lessons showed a 28.8% improvement
in their test scores (
= +1.92; maximum score = 9).
- Students of Teaching SMART teachers who completed the fifth grade science lessons showed a 19.9% improvement
in their test scores (
= +1.16; maximum score = 9).
Findings — Teachers
- There was a 16.7% increase in spending more time teaching measurement, graphing, and observing natural phenomena.
- There was a 16.8% increase in having students develop and test their own scientific hypotheses and predictions.
- There was no significant change in the amount of time spent lecturing in class, but there was a 16.7%
increase in the amount of time spent on hands-on activities.
|
Marsha Lakes Matyas, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant
Funded by The Bush Foundation and The National Science Foundation
Evaluation Results for Teaching SMART implementation -- 1992-1997
|
 |
Significant evidence points toward the following conclusions (teachers):
- Teachers participating in Teaching SMART significantly increased their plans to incorporate and did incorporate
more student-centered learning activities into their curriculum while reducing the amount of teacher-centered
learning activities.
- Participation in Teaching SMART increased teachers' confidence in their science teaching skills.
- Teaching SMART Teachers incorporated the key teaching strategies promoted by the National Science Education
Standards.
- Teaching SMART Teachers incorporated hands-on and/or inquiry-approach science activities that promoted the
development of students' science process skills.
- Teaching SMART Teachers reduced the use of more didactic teaching strategies such as lecture, whole class
discussion, and teacher demonstration.
Significant evidence points toward the following conclusions (students):
- The Teaching SMART classroom is an excellent vehicle for conveying both science content knowledge and
problem-solving skills to students in elementary grades.
- Teaching SMART students increased their content knowledge and problem-solving skills statistically significantly
more than did Comparison Group students.
- Teaching SMART students may develop better test-taking skills and problem solving skills (when faced with new
topics or tasks).
|
Youth & Family Services
1920 N. Plaza Blvd.
P.O. Box 2813
Rapid City, SD 57709-2813
Copyright © 2008 Youth & Family Services Inc. All rights reserved.
|